Explore official dispute-resolution archives. The Policy Rules requires each provider to publish its decisions (Para. 16(b)). In order of the number of disputes they process, the arbitration providers are: 

 

WIPO (see Reference Desk) Also, Supplemental Rules, World Intellectual Property Organization​ 

Forum: Supplemental Rules, Forum

Czech Arbitration Court

CIIDRC: Canadian Internet Dispute Resolution Centre

-- Doug Isenberg, Inside the Canadian International Internet Dispute Resolution Centre (CIIDRC)

ADNRC: Asian Domain Name Dispute Resolution Centre

         Decisions filed by WIPO, Forum, Czech Arbitration Court and the Canadian Internet Resolution Centre are also searchable on <udrp.tools>. Commentaries on decisions are available on the Internet Commerce Association website which publishes a weekly digest. See also Domain Name Wire commenting on a daily basis selected published decisions. 

​

CIIDRC regularly publishes discussions on UDRP practice and decisions. Go to YouTube and search for CIIDRC. Among these is a video discussion by Doug Isenberg on filing a UDRP complaint. Other videos feature experts discussing UDRP cases and the jurisprudence that has developed since the implementation of the UDRP in 1999. First case published in January 2000. If you have citations to add 

        Domain disputes involving .ca are determined under the CIRA Policy.

There is no equivalent for .ca jurisprudence to the WIPO Overview, but this Policy invites citations from other UDRP providers. LCP is engaged on an ongoing project collecting .CA citations. Herein, the latest version of Dot ca ISSUES INDEX. If you have citations to add, send them to Gerald Levine at gmlevine@researchtheworld.com for addition to the Index.

 

UDRP decisions can be researched in <udrp.tools>. Information on panelists can be researched in an earlier version of <udrp.tools> at  https://udrp.tools/.​​​